1. Introduction: Common Cases Where FIND_IN_SET is Needed
When handling data in MySQL, you may encounter cases where “multiple values are saved in a single column, separated by commas.” For example, user-selected tags or category information, setting flags, etc., are stored as a single string like php,python,sql. Such a structure is not recommended from the perspective of database normalization in principle. However, in situations where the design of existing systems or flexible data input is prioritized, you may have no choice but to use this format in reality.
The Savior When Struggling with Tag Searches
For example, suppose you want to check if a certain user has the tag “python.” With the usual = operator or LIKE operator, there are limitations in partial matching or matching accuracy with surrounding characters, and it may return incorrect results. In such cases, the FIND_IN_SET() function is useful. FIND_IN_SET() is a MySQL function that determines the position of a specific string within a comma-separated string. If it exists, it returns the index (starting from 1); if not, it returns 0. Using this function, you can accurately and flexibly determine whether tags, categories, setting values, etc., are included.
Common Usage Scenarios
Typical cases where FIND_IN_SET is useful are as follows.
When you want to extract a specific value from “tags” or “categories” saved in comma-separated format
When you want to use values input in CSV format in the admin screen, etc., as search conditions
When you want to perform flexible filtering on meta information in CMS like WordPress
When you want to process without modifying an existing table where multiple selection items are consolidated into one column
While there are such needs, if misused, FIND_IN_SET can cause performance degradation or false detections. Therefore, in this article, we will explain from the basic syntax of FIND_IN_SET to application examples, precautions, and alternatives, in an easy-to-understand manner with practical examples.
2. What is the FIND_IN_SET Function? [Basic Syntax and Return Value]
MySQL’s FIND_IN_SET() function is a function that checks the position of a specified value within a comma-separated string. It is very useful when multiple values in the database are stored together in a single field. This function is unique to MySQL and does not exist by default in other databases (such as PostgreSQL or SQLite), making it a feature specialized for MySQL environments.
Basic Syntax
FIND_IN_SET(search_value, comma-separated_string)
Search Value: The string to search for
Comma-Separated String: The comma-separated list to search in
Usage Example
For example, consider the following SQL.
SELECT FIND_IN_SET('python', 'php,python,sql');
In this case, since 'python' is in the 2nd position, 2 is returned as the return value. Conversely, if the specified value does not exist in the list, 0 is returned as follows.
In this way, by effectively using the return value, it can be applied not only to searches but also to scenarios where you want to check the order of inclusion.
Note: 0 Means “Does Not Exist”
When the return value is 0, it indicates that the value “does not exist in the list.” In MySQL, 0 is treated as FALSE, so using it directly in a WHERE clause can cause unexpected behavior. In the next chapter, we will introduce basic query examples on how to use FIND_IN_SET to search against actual table data.
3. Practical Example 1: Basic Usage [Simple SELECT Statement]
FIND_IN_SET() function, as its name suggests, is for “finding in a set,” but how should you write it when actually using it on table data?
Here, we introduce the simplest usage example using a SELECT statement.
Preparation of the Example Table
First, assume a table like the following.Table Name: user_tags
id
name
tags
1
Tanaka
php,python,sql
2
Suzuki
java,ruby
3
Sato
python,c,go
This tags column stores the skill tags registered by the user, separated by commas.
Example: Searching for Users with “python”
If you want to extract only the users who have the “python” tag from this, write SQL like the following.
SELECT * FROM user_tags
WHERE FIND_IN_SET('python', tags);
Execution Result:
id
name
tags
1
Tanaka
php,python,sql
3
Sato
python,c,go
In this way, only the records where “python” is included in the tags column were returned.
Exact String Matching is the Key
FIND_IN_SET() performs matching by exact string matching. Therefore, it won’t match partial strings like “py” or “pyth”. If partial matching is needed, use the LIKE operator, but writing something like LIKE '%python%' risks mistakenly matching up to php in php,python,sql, so FIND_IN_SET is more suitable for comma-separated lists.
Example of Search Using Variables in SQL
If you want to dynamically change the search value, you can search flexibly by using variables.
SET @skill = 'python';
SELECT * FROM user_tags
WHERE FIND_IN_SET(@skill, tags);
This writing method is also effective when linking with applications or stored procedures.
4. Practical Example 2: Handling Dynamic Searches (Variables and Form Integration)
In actual web applications or business systems, there are often scenarios where search conditions are dynamically incorporated into SQL.
For example, cases where you want to search using FIND_IN_SET() with values selected by the user in a form or values automatically generated within the system. Here, we introduce practical usage assuming variables or backend integration.
Dynamic Search Using Variables in SQL
By using MySQL’s session variables (@variable_name), you can define the search value at the beginning of the code and reuse it in multiple queries.
-- Store the tag to search for in a variable
SET @target_tag = 'python';
-- Dynamic search with FIND_IN_SET
SELECT * FROM user_tags
WHERE FIND_IN_SET(@target_tag, tags);
This way, the search value can be easily replaced, and it can be utilized in stored procedures or batch processing, etc.
Integration with Applications: PHP Case
For example, when issuing SQL based on web form input using PHP, the code would be something like the following.
<?php
$tag = $_GET['tag']; // Example: Form input "python"
// SQL generation (prepared statements are recommended)
$sql = "SELECT * FROM user_tags WHERE FIND_IN_SET(?, tags)";
$stmt = $pdo->prepare($sql);
$stmt->execute([$tag]);
$results = $stmt->fetchAll();
?>
This way, combining with prepared statements ensures complete protection against SQL injection.
Application in WordPress: Tag Search in Custom Fields
In WordPress, you can search custom fields using meta_query, but if you want to incorporate FIND_IN_SET, you need to use SQL directly as follows. Example: When "php,python,sql" is stored in the custom field _user_tags
global $wpdb;
$tag = 'python';
$sql = $wpdb->prepare(
"SELECT * FROM {$wpdb->prefix}postmeta WHERE meta_key = %s AND FIND_IN_SET(%s, meta_value)",
'_user_tags', $tag
);
$results = $wpdb->get_results($sql);
Using this method, flexible searches that cannot be handled by WordPress’s standard features become possible.
Caution: Be Careful with Spaces and Full-Width Commas
When using FIND_IN_SET, if the comma-separated string being searched contains extra spaces or full-width characters, it will not match.
Therefore, it is recommended to perform preprocessing such as the following at the time of data registration or before searching.
Remove spaces with the TRIM() function
Normalize the comma format (full-width to half-width)
Input validation on the application side
5. Advanced Techniques for FIND_IN_SET [GROUP_CONCAT, Subqueries, JOIN]
FIND_IN_SET function can handle not only basic single searches but also more flexible and complex search processing by combining with other SQL functions or subqueries. In this chapter, we introduce three representative application patterns.
Combining with GROUP_CONCAT
First, it’s the integration with GROUP_CONCAT(), which can handle multiple rows’ values as a single comma-separated string. For example, it’s effective in scenarios where you create a list of target tags from one table and use it as a search condition for another table.Example: Matching the values in the tags column of the user_tags table with the tag list in the master_tags table
SELECT *
FROM user_tags
WHERE FIND_IN_SET('python', (
SELECT GROUP_CONCAT(tag_name)
FROM master_tags
));
This query converts the tag list existing in master_tags into a single comma-separated string and performs matching against it using FIND_IN_SET(). Note that the length of the string generated by GROUP_CONCAT has a limit (default is 1024 characters), so if there is a lot of target data, please check the group_concat_max_len setting.
Retrieving Values Dynamically with Subqueries for Searching
Next, a method to dynamically retrieve the search target values with a subquery and pass them to FIND_IN_SET.Example: Obtaining search conditions from a management table that holds the latest settings and filtering data based on them
SELECT *
FROM user_tags
WHERE FIND_IN_SET(
'python',
(SELECT setting_value FROM search_conditions WHERE id = 1)
);
In this example, search conditions are stored in a management table, allowing the search content to be switched simply by changing the system settings.
Due to its high flexibility, it’s convenient for customizable management screens or dashboard-type applications.
Comparison with JOIN: JOIN is Superior in Normalized Structures
FIND_IN_SET is a convenient function, but if the database design is originally normalized, searches using JOIN are more efficient and safer. For example, if it’s a many-to-many relationship using an intermediate table as below, it can be realized simply with JOIN without using FIND_IN_SET.Configuration Example:
users table
tags table
user_tag_relation table (intermediate table holding user_id and tag_id)
SELECT users.*
FROM users
JOIN user_tag_relation ON users.id = user_tag_relation.user_id
JOIN tags ON user_tag_relation.tag_id = tags.id
WHERE tags.name = 'python';
With such a design, search performance improves, and it’s easier to handle future data expansions.
Which Technique Should You Choose?
Technique
Suitable Cases
FIND_IN_SET + GROUP_CONCAT
When you want to dynamically control the filter list
FIND_IN_SET + Subquery
When you want to extract and use conditions from a management table, etc.
JOIN
Normalized structures, large data volumes, performance-oriented
In this way, FIND_IN_SET() can significantly enhance the flexibility of search conditions by combining with other SQL features. However, depending on the usage scenario or data structure, JOIN or other methods may be more suitable, so it’s important to choose according to the design and purpose.
6. Pitfalls and Precautions for FIND_IN_SET [Performance and Design Aspects]
FIND_IN_SET function is a convenient function that enables flexible searches on comma-separated strings, but you should avoid using it indiscriminately.
Here, we explain the performance aspects and risks in database design that often become issues in actual development environments.
Performance Deteriorates Because Indexes Do Not Work
FIND_IN_SET’s biggest drawback is that indexes on the search target column do not take effect. For example, suppose you execute a query like the following.
SELECT * FROM user_tags
WHERE FIND_IN_SET('python', tags);
In this case, even if an index is created on the tags column, using the FIND_IN_SET function results in a full table scan, and MySQL has no choice but to read all rows and parse the strings sequentially. Therefore, in large-scale data where the target records exceed thousands to tens of thousands, the search speed drops dramatically. Recommended measures:
Consider normalization using an intermediate table as needed
If you must use FIND_IN_SET, narrow down the target records in advance (use in combination with LIMIT or other WHERE conditions)
Becoming Dependent on a Structure That Contradicts Normalization
Consolidating comma-separated strings into one column itself contradicts the principles of database normalization. For example, a string like "php,python,sql" may seem easy to handle at first glance, but it has the following problems.
Aggregation and statistical processing per value is difficult
Updating or deleting only some values is challenging
Duplicates or spelling mistakes in values are prone to occur (e.g., “Python” and “python”)
From a long-term perspective, it often becomes a significant disadvantage from the perspectives of readability, maintainability, and extensibility, and is particularly fatal in team development or scalable services.
Search Fails Due to Inclusion of Characters Other Than Commas or Spaces
FIND_IN_SET is very delicate. If there are problems like the following in the data, it will not match.
Spaces (spaces, tabs, line breaks) before and after values
Full-width commas (,) are mixed in
Unintentionally surrounded by double quotes or single quotes
Example:
FIND_IN_SET('python', 'php, python ,sql')
-- ⇒ Does not match (it becomes " python " with spaces)
Measures:
At the data registration stage, include TRIM() processing to remove spaces
Preprocess input values with REPLACE(tags, ' ', '')
Input restrictions on the frontend (exclude unnecessary spaces and symbols)
Effective as a Temporary Measure, But Not Suitable for Permanent Operation
FIND_IN_SET is very useful as a provisional means to temporarily utilize existing denormalized tables.
However, in newly designed systems or systems planned for long-term expansion and maintenance, it is important to avoid it as much as possible or to have a plan to migrate to normalization in the future.
7. Common Misconceptions and Failure Examples [Differences from LIKE / Handling Numbers]
FIND_IN_SET function may seem simple to use at first glance, but if not understood and used correctly, it can lead to unintended results.
This chapter introduces typical misconceptions and failure patterns that are common in practice, and explains countermeasures for each.
Misconception ①: Not Understanding the Difference Between LIKE and FIND_IN_SET
The most common case is searching with incorrect conditions without correctly understanding the difference between the LIKE operator and FIND_IN_SET().
-- Common Misuse
SELECT * FROM user_tags WHERE tags LIKE '%python%';
This query may seem to work correctly at first glance, but in reality, it will match all data that partially contains the string python. For example, it will pick up cases like "cpython","pythonista","java,pythonic", etc., which you originally didn’t want to match.
Also, when you want to match only “python” in comma-separated like php,python,sql, with partial matching LIKE, there is a high possibility of false positives. If you want to confirm exactly that the word “python” is included, FIND_IN_SET() is appropriate.
-- Correct Way to Write
SELECT * FROM user_tags WHERE FIND_IN_SET('python', tags);
Misconception ②: FIND_IN_SET Doesn’t Work as Intended with “Numeric” Values
FIND_IN_SET assumes that both arguments are treated as strings. Therefore, with data like the following, unexpected results may occur.
-- tags column contains: 1,2,10,20
SELECT * FROM user_tags WHERE FIND_IN_SET(1, tags);
In this query, it’s common to think that both 1 and 10 will match, but in reality, FIND_IN_SET(1, '1,2,10,20') only matches the “first 1”. Since FIND_IN_SET determines exact matches by separating values, 1 is different from 10 or 21. However, some developers may misunderstand this behavior and think that “1” hits “10” as well. Countermeasure: By always treating as strings, you can prevent unintended behavior.
Misconception ③: Doesn’t Match Correctly Due to Spaces, Full-width Commas, Line Breaks, etc.
FIND_IN_SET is very delicate. If there are problems like the following in the data, it won’t match.
Spaces (space, tab, newline) before or after values
Full-width commas (、) are mixed in
Surrounded by unintended double quotes or single quotes
Example:
FIND_IN_SET('python', 'php, python ,sql')
-- ⇒ Doesn't match (becomes " python " with spaces)
Countermeasures:
At the data registration stage, include TRIM() processing to remove spaces
Preprocess input values with REPLACE(tags, ' ', '')
Input restrictions on the frontend (exclude unnecessary spaces and symbols)
Summary: Points for Using FIND_IN_SET Safely
Misconceptions and Pitfalls
Countermeasures
Confusing with LIKE and causing false positives
Use FIND_IN_SET when exact match is needed
Unexpected behavior in handling numbers
Treat numbers as strings and make comparisons explicit
Spaces or full-width characters affect it
Thoroughly preprocess before data registration and searching
If you use it without understanding these fine behaviors, it can lead to a serious bug where you think “the search is working” but in reality, the expected data wasn’t extracted. In the next chapter, we will explain effective “alternatives to FIND_IN_SET” that solve these problems from the root.
8. Alternatives to FIND_IN_SET [Best Practices]
FIND_IN_SET function is a convenient function that enables flexible searching against comma-separated strings, but it is not suitable for large-scale data or systems that require scalability.
This chapter introduces more recommended alternatives (best practices) that do not use FIND_IN_SET.
Switch to Normalized Table Design
The most recommended method is to normalize the database and manage values as individual rows.
Instead of storing multiple values in a single comma-separated column, use a junction table (relation table) to clearly express many-to-many relationships.Example: User and Tag RelationshipConventional Structure (Denormalized):
user_id
tags
1
php,python,sql
Normalized Structure:users table
id
name
1
Tanaka
tags table
id
name
1
php
2
python
3
sql
user_tag_relation (junction table)
user_id
tag_id
1
1
1
2
1
3
By separating like this, flexible searching becomes possible with JOIN without using FIND_IN_SET.
SELECT users.*
FROM users
JOIN user_tag_relation ON users.id = user_tag_relation.user_id
JOIN tags ON user_tag_relation.tag_id = tags.id
WHERE tags.name = 'python';
With this method, indexes can also be used effectively, and performance and scalability are significantly improved.
Utilizing JSON Type (MySQL 5.7 and Later)
In MySQL 5.7 and later, JSON type columns are available. By storing values as JSON arrays instead of comma-separated strings, you can save structured data as is and search using functions.Example:
["php", "python", "sql"]
Search Example:
SELECT * FROM user_tags
WHERE JSON_CONTAINS(tags_json, '"python"');
With this method, tags are stored structurally, preventing issues like false positives or whitespace intrusion.
Additionally, JSON types have dedicated indexes (MySQL 8.0 and later), and performance improvements can be expected.
Decompose and Reconstruct on the Application Side
Even if you can’t change the design that uses FIND_IN_SET, by converting to an array on the application side and using loop processing or converting to SQL’s IN clause, you can achieve similar behavior.Example (PHP):
This way, you can reduce the load on the database while performing safe processing.
FIND_IN_SET Should Be Used as an “Exceptional Handling”
As repeated, FIND_IN_SET is very useful as a “temporary measure to leverage existing denormalized tables in the short term.”
However, for newly designed systems or systems planned for long-term expansion and maintenance, it is important to avoid it as much as possible or have a plan to migrate to normalization in the future.
Method
Suitable Cases
Normalization + JOIN
When performance and scalability are important
JSON Type + JSON Functions
When you want to store with flexible data structures
Application-Side Processing
For temporary processing or read-only cases
FIND_IN_SET
Short-term solution for existing DBs where structural changes are difficult
9. [FAQ] Frequently Asked Questions and Their Answers
The FIND_IN_SET function often raises many questions and confusions during real-world tasks or learning.
Here, we’ve compiled common questions in a Q&A format that aligns well with search intents.
Q1. When is it correct to use the FIND_IN_SET function?
A.The FIND_IN_SET function is used when you want to check if a specific value is included in a comma-separated string.
Specifically, it is suitable for situations like:
Design requires storing multiple values in one column (e.g., tags, permissions, flags, etc.)
You want to search without modifying an existing denormalized database
For small to medium data volumes, limited use cases (admin panels, tools, etc.)
However, it is not suitable for large data volumes or core processing in production systems.
Q2. What is the difference between FIND_IN_SET and LIKE?
A.LIKE '%value%' is a partial match search and will hit regardless of what comes before or after.
On the other hand, FIND_IN_SET('value', comma-separated string) searches for exact matches as individual values separated by commas.
-- Example with LIKE (matches everything containing "python")
tags LIKE '%python%'
-- Example with FIND_IN_SET (matches only the independent element "python")
FIND_IN_SET('python', tags)
The pitfall of LIKE is that “python” will also match in “cpython” or “pythonista”.
Q3. Why does using the FIND_IN_SET function make SQL slow?
A.Because FIND_IN_SET is a function that performs a full scan without using indexes.
It checks the entire column row by row, involving processing to split the string and compare, so processing time increases dramatically as data volume grows. Therefore, it directly leads to performance degradation in tables with many records.
Q4. When searching for numbers, is there no misrecognition between “1” and “10”?
A.Since FIND_IN_SET is an exact match search, basically “1” and “10” are judged as different.
However, if there are differences in spaces or casting in the search value or data, it may not behave as expected.
-- Correct example
FIND_IN_SET('1', '1,2,10') -- ⇒ 1 (first position)
-- Example prone to misunderstanding
FIND_IN_SET(1, '1,2,10') -- ⇒ Similarly 1 (OK but ambiguous)
Recommendation: By always handling as strings, you can prevent unintended behavior.
Q5. Can I use FIND_IN_SET in WordPress?
A.FIND_IN_SET cannot be used in WordPress standard meta_query etc., but it can be used with direct SQL execution using $wpdb.
global $wpdb;
$sql = $wpdb->prepare("
SELECT * FROM {$wpdb->prefix}postmeta
WHERE meta_key = %s AND FIND_IN_SET(%s, meta_value)
", 'your_meta_key', 'search_value');
$results = $wpdb->get_results($sql);
However, if the DB design depends on custom fields, you should also consider alternative methods (such as managing multiple meta keys).
Q6. What is the difference with JSON type? Is it more convenient than FIND_IN_SET?
A.Using JSON type columns since MySQL 5.7 allows storing structured data and searching with JSON_CONTAINS().
It is superior to FIND_IN_SET in terms of accuracy, scalability, and flexibility.
-- Search with JSON
SELECT * FROM users WHERE JSON_CONTAINS(tags_json, '"python"');
In future designs, it is the trend to prioritize JSON type over FIND_IN_SET.
10. Summary: FIND_IN_SET is a “Convenient Exception” | An Opportunity to Review Structural Design
In this article, we have covered the MySQL FIND_IN_SET() function extensively, from basic syntax to practical application examples, precautions, and alternatives. At first glance, it may seem like an unassuming function, but when used correctly, it is a powerful tool that expands the scope of database operations.
Reviewing the Features of FIND_IN_SET
Feature
Explanation
✅ Flexible comma-separated search is possible
It can perform “value-level matching” that is difficult with LIKE
✅ Easy to accommodate non-normalized existing DBs
Can be handled with search logic alone without changing the data structure
⚠ Indexes do not work, and performance is an issue
In large tables, it can cause speed degradation
⚠ Easily affected by input and storage errors
If spaces or full-width symbols are mixed in, matching fails
Cases Where It Should Be Used and Cases to Avoid
OK to Use:
The search target is small-scale and the use is limited
Modifying the existing system is difficult, and immediate response is needed
Want to temporarily handle it in admin screens or batch processing, etc.
Cases Where It Should Not Be Used:
Situations where search speed is required for large-scale data
Businesses that require frequent updates, aggregation, and condition changes
Designs that assume future expansion and maintenance
FIND_IN_SET is a “Convenient Exception”. The Essence Lies in Reviewing the Design
FIND_IN_SET is, after all, a workaround for when there are structural constraints.
If you are designing tables from scratch, please consider the following two points.
Normalize the database and manage many-to-many relationships with intermediate tables
If flexibility is needed, introduce JSON type to handle structured data
I hope that this article serves as a trigger for you to re-recognize the appropriate uses and limitations of FIND_IN_SET, and that “reviewing the design” is the optimal solution.